March 2010 Newsletter

March 2010

Deficits Home and Abroad

We’re all hearing a lot about U.S. budget deficits, which are high by historical standards.  According to figures compiled on the website www.usGovernmentSpending.com, the projected deficit in 2010 will be 8.54% of U.S. GDP (a measure of total economic output in the country).  This percentage has been exceeded only six times in U.S. history: 1918 (11.88%), 1919 (16.86%), 1942 (12.04%), 1943 (28.05%), 1944 (22.35%) and 1945 (24.06%).  A more normal figure is in the 2% to 5% range, although there were four recent years — 1998 through 2001 — when the government balance sheet showed a surplus.  The government also managed surpluses in 1969, 1960, 1956-57 and 1951-52.

The size of the deficit is worrisome to economists.  But an article in the January 14 issue of The Economist magazine says that we may have gotten through the recent banking meltdown fairly inexpensively.  Previous systemic banking crises have, on average, cost 13% of GDP to resolve, according to the International Monetary Fund.  But because the U.S. government offered its assistance in the form of loans (which were mostly paid back with interest by the big investment banks) and stock (which may appreciate in value), the final cost is now projected to be somewhere around $90 billion — almost all explained by losing investments in General Motors, Chrysler and AIG, and by subsidies to homeowners to help modify their mortgages.  A proposed special tax on large investment banks could further reduce the cost to practically zero, and the Federal Reserve and the FDIC both made money on loan and bank-bond guarantees.  The article cautions that a fair accounting would include the $111 billion capital infusion into Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which brings the total bailout cost to something less than 2% of GDP.

Of course, the U.S. government is also spending money to pull the country out of recession.  However, almost unnoticed in the deficit debate is the fact that almost all other countries in the world are also running up deficits — for the same purpose.  A chart  in the January 23 issue of The Economist (page 90) ranks the world’s economies according to their 2009 deficits as a percentage of GDP. Of the 40 countries listed, only two were not running a deficit (Saudi Arabia and Norway).  The U.S.’s 2009 deficit was 10% of GDP, giving it a fourth place ranking (behind Britain, Greece and Spain). 

While the U.S. deficit is higher than the global average of 5.42%, it is not unusual and certainly not the worst.  It is also probable that a higher percentage of its deficit will go toward jobs growth than countries which handled their banking crises less thriftily.  Even countries that are running a surplus are still spending more than they generate in taxes in an effort to avoid a second dip from this recession.  Around the world, virtually everybody is following the same course to bring global economic growth and prosperity in 2010 and beyond.  Let’s hope it works. -By Bob Veres

Spring Cleaning

If one of your New Years resolutions is to clean out your financial records, here’s a list of what to keep vs. toss (and by “toss” we mean “bring to the Silver Oak office for shredding”).

Upcoming Workshops

The next "Investment Boot Camp" programs will be held:

Saturday, April 24th, 9:30 to 11:30 am

Seating is limited; please RSVP to Linda at (503) 242-1715 or register on our website.

Additional Links